In the Executioner’s Shadow draws viewers into riveting personal stories: the rare perspective of a former state executioner who nearly executes an innocent person; a Boston Marathon bombing victim who struggles to decide what justice really means; and the parents of a murder victim who face abandoning their values or fighting for the life of their daughter’s killer. As the battle to overturn capital punishment comes to a head in the U.S., this provocative film challenges viewers to question their deepest beliefs about justice. (License fee includes 54 min. and 40 min. versions, plus outreach materials.)
“Powerful storytelling can make a difference. It can turn society around and move us to higher ethical ground. This film is imbued with authenticity.”
In the Executioner’s Shadow explores justice, injustice and the death penalty. The film interweaves three compelling personal narratives. One is the story of a couple who lost their young, adult daughter to a violent rape and murder. Motivated by their deep religious convictions, Vicki and Sylvester fight to spare the life of their daughter’s killer. Karen, a survivor of the Boston Marathon bombing, agonizes to define justice. In the aftermath of the tragedy, she’s torn between the fatal punishment that could be imposed upon a terrorist and the protective instincts of a mother whose son is the same age as the bomber. The fulcrum between these stories is the rarely heard perspective of a former chief executioner. The discovery that an inmate he was scheduled to execute was ultimately exonerated, gives Jerry a profound epiphany that few will ever know.
Opening the minds of viewers to the apprehensions and aspirations of others is the engagement this documentary aims to achieve. By presenting both sides of the controversy the film invites viewers to set aside preconceptions, reserve judgment and reflect on the sort of society we want to be.
“It is the potential of this documentary to move us toward a more enlightened society that excites me about this work.”
“It is very powerful.”
“It is the filmmakers’ intent to get people talking, to get viewers to question their originally held positions, to disrupt complacency."